Scott Pruitt, Trump’s EPA nominee, questions human’s role in climate change

Scott Pruitt, the campaigner for EPA administrator, arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 18, 2017.
Image: AP Photo/ J. Scott Applewhite

President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to run the Environmental Protection Agency( EPA) wrongly intimated on Wednesday that scientists still don’t know exactly why climate change is happening.

Scott Pruitt, the Republican attorney general of Oklahoma, claimed during his Senate confirmation hearing that environment professionals are still debating the fullest extent to which human activity is driving up world-wide temperatures.

In reality, most climate scientists debate the precise bangs human-caused climate change is having, as well as the rate and severity of global warming more to arisen but they don’t dialogue that human activity is the leading cause.

“I feel the ability to measure with precision different degrees of human activity’s impact on the environment be subordinated to more dialogue, for purposes of determining whether the environment is changing or whether human activity contributing to it, ” Pruitt enunciated Wednesday in a tense exchange with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, a prominent environment campaigner who lost the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.



Pruitt had previously accepted at the hearing that “the climate is changing and human activity contributes to that in some manner.”

He likewise distanced himself from his prospective boss, saying he did not agree with Trump’s earlier claims that the Chinese government fabricated the idea of climate change.

“I do not feel climate change is a prank, ” Pruitt told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

As EPA administrator, Pruitt would oversee the most important federal programs to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, including regulations of carbon dioxide from power plant and methane emissions resulting from natural gas well locates and pipelines.

Global average temperature anomalies per year, with the warmest times scheduled, including 2016.

Image: nasa giss.

When Sanders pulped Pruitt to give his personal opinion on why the environment was changing, the EPA nominee stated in response that his feelings on the topic were “immaterial” to his character as potential EPA chief.

“Really? ” Sanders interjected, incredulously. “You are going to be the heads of state of the agency to protect the environmental issues, and your personal flavors of determining whether climate change was a result of human activity is trivial? ”

Pruitt responded indirectly, suggesting, “Senator, I feel the head has a very important role to perform in modulating CO2. ”

Counter to Pruitt’s claims of uncertainty, the overwhelming majority of the world’s environment scientists agree that human activity such as igniting fossil fuels and clear-cutting woods is the No. 1 reason why the planet is warming at such a astounding rate.

In fact, during the evidence hearing, world-wide environment monitoring enterprises including NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the UK Met Office announced that 2016 was the warmest year on record.

The enterprises concluded that human-caused global warming was primarily responsible for the hazardous environment milestone.

Scientists and environmentalists have carried panic that the top U.S. agency for modulating climate change “couldve been” run by someone who is disputes mainstream environment science.

Earlier this week, over 170 environmental and social right groups sent a letter to the Senate committee that claimed Pruitt’s “views and actions roll counter to the EPA’s critical mission to protect our state and the environment.”

His connoisseurs likewise was pointed out that Pruitt has spent times fighting to overthrow the EPA’s key environmental principles, often with the support of Oklahoma’s strong oil and gas industry.

Pruitt forms part of a alignment of Republican advocates general who reportedly forged us-led coalition forces with some of the nation’s biggest oil and gas makes to fight against the Obama administration’s environmental agenda.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, points to a chart as he themes EPA nominee, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, in Washington on Jan. 18, 2017.

Image: AP Photo/ J. Scott Applewhite

Democratic senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Kamala Harris also propagandized Pruitt to disclose whether, if corroborated as the EPA chief, he would recuse himself from the prosecution he wreaked against the EPA as Oklahoma’s attorney general.

Pruitt said only that he would step down from those cases if directed by the EPA’s Ethics Office.

The attorney general’s top partisans on the Senate committee saluted Pruitt’s efforts to limit “federal overreach” by the EPA and represent the jobs of hundreds of thousands of workers in the fossil fuel industry.

“As head of the EPA, attorney general Pruitt has a responsibility to ensure that the agency fulfills the character delegated to it by the laws to be adopted by Congress, ” Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, the Senate’s most prominent climate change-denier, said during the hearing.

Read more: http :// 2017/01/ 18/ epa-nominee-pruitt-questions-climate-science /

What do you think?

0 points

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%